Crypto Prices

This Week’s Legal Developments in Cryptocurrency (October 18, 2026)

1 hour ago
2 mins read
2 views

Legal Updates in Cryptocurrency

In the latest installment of Law and Ledger, a news segment focusing on legal matters concerning cryptocurrency, we bring you updates from the legal landscape impacting digital assets, courtesy of Kelman Law, a firm specializing in this innovative sector. Recent judicial and regulatory developments highlight the varied approaches being taken by courts and agencies towards cryptocurrency.

Key Judicial Ruling

A notable ruling on October 15 by Judge Alvin Hellerstein from the Southern District of New York upheld a previous CFTC order involving Gemini Trust Company, despite a shift in the enforcement policies of the agency. The CFTC had initially filed a lawsuit against Gemini in 2022 for allegedly making misleading statements during a review of a proposed bitcoin futures contract. Although Gemini had already settled the case by agreeing to a $5 million penalty and accepting a permanent injunction, they later sought to vacate the order alongside the CFTC, claiming that new enforcement standards would have prevented the initial lawsuit.

However, the court ruled that the request did not meet the necessary legal grounds for post-judgment relief and thus maintained the binding nature of the consent order. Judge Hellerstein concluded that changes in agency policy do not automatically invalidate court rulings. This case serves as a cautionary tale for companies contemplating settlements, as prior admissions and legal obligations may persist regardless of shifts in regulatory priorities.

OCC Report on Banking Practices

Meanwhile, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released a damning report on October 14 regarding banking practices affecting digital-asset businesses. The findings revealed that all nine national banks under OCC oversight have restrictive policies that could limit services to lawful businesses based on reputational risks rather than objective assessments. Notably, companies in the digital asset space were identified as particularly vulnerable to these restrictions.

The OCC analyzed tens of thousands of documents and complaints to conclude that banks need to reassess their practices in light of documented risks and provide clearer standards for compliance. This development suggests an important pivot in how banks might evaluate service eligibility for digital asset entities, necessitating that these firms demonstrate robust compliance measures moving forward.

Illinois Digital Asset Tax Act

In Illinois, legal challenges to the recently introduced Digital Asset Tax Act are set to accelerate following a joint request from industry stakeholders for expedited resolution. This law imposes a 0.2% tax on certain digital asset transactions, facing opposition based on constitutional concerns and potential overreach as per the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act. The Illinois Circuit Court is being asked to fast-track the case, with hearings anticipated as early as February 2027, while the enforcement of this tax has been paused until July 1, 2027.

European Banking Authority’s Recognition

Across the Atlantic, the European Banking Authority (EBA) made headlines by recognizing USDC as the first e-money token deemed significant under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). This classification places USDC under stricter regulatory oversight beginning November 12, delineating responsibilities between the EBA and France’s regulatory authority, which will cover various aspects of compliance. This decision signals a noteworthy shift towards greater regulatory scrutiny for significant stablecoins in Europe.

High Court Ruling in London

Finally, the High Court in London made a ruling on October 12 establishing that Chinese law will govern the claims of individuals seeking to recover around 61,000 bitcoin linked to a fraud case. The ruling stressed that the location of assets does not necessarily dictate the legal framework for ownership disputes, emphasizing that the context of the fraud will play a crucial role in future judicial considerations.

Conclusion

These developments underline the continuously evolving regulatory environment surrounding digital assets, posing new challenges and considerations for businesses and individuals alike as they navigate the complexities of cryptocurrency law. For further assistance with legal matters involving crypto assets, you are encouraged to reach out to Kelman Law for guidance.

Popular